Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Certificate of Merit Procedure
On May 29, 2026, Texas Supreme Court clarified an important procedural issue involving the Certificate of Merit requirement under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 150.002 that affects claims against architects, engineers, and other licensed or registered design professionals. In Studio E. Architecture & Interiors, Inc. v. Lehmberg, 741 S.W.3d 67 (Tex. 2026), the Court held that when claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to file a Certificate of Merit, those claims may be reasserted through an amended petition—rather than a newly filed lawsuit—provided the underlyi
All Tornados are Windstorms, But not Vice Versa
Recently, the Texas Supreme Court examined in Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange v. Mankoff, 733 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. 2025), whether a tornado is a windstorm.
The Dispute
The Mankoff’s suffered a loss of their home due to a tornado. Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange (PURE) accepted the claim and paid for damages, but claimed there was a higher deductible because the tornado was a windstorm. The term “windstorm” was not defined by the insurance policy. The Mankoffs claimed that the term windstorm was distinct from a tornado and because the word “tornado” was not used
Email and Form Notice under the Texas Property Code
The 2022 changes to the lien laws in Texas made it possible for lien claimants to email their pre-lien notices to the original contractor and owner, as opposed to certified or registered mail, only. But, what constitutes substantial compliance with the lien laws in terms of providing electronic notice? Is emailing a pay application alone sufficient? The statute is instructive, but case law is scarce since many of the 2022 revisions have yet to be litigated.
Notice under Chapter 53 of the Texas Property Code
The lien statute provides that any notice or other written communication required by
The End of Contractual Protections for Architects and Engineers? The Texas Supreme Court and Pitts v. Rivas
In 2025, the Texas Supreme Court issued its decision in Pitts v. Rivas, setting off a firestorm across the state of Texas about whether contracts no longer matter for professionals, particularly design professionals. If the “gist” of a complaint against an architect or engineer is that its services did not meet the applicable standard of care, can the design professional rely on waivers of consequential damages or limitations of liability or even scope exclusions written into their services agreements?
Key Findings of Pitts v. Rivas:
– If the “gist of a client’s complaint” or â
Why ‘Almost’ Performance and Necessary Damages Fall Short
In an industry that relies heavily on contract compliance, construction contractors and suppliers operate with little room for error – particularly when it comes to job-critical equipment. A recent memorandum opinion from the Texas Court of Appeals out of Dallas, as see in Fabricating Machinery, Inc. v. RLB Construction, Ltd. d/b/a RoofTec, underscores three key principles:
– contract conformity requires complete, not partial performance;
– a buyer does not waive available remedies by accepting non-conforming goods; and,
– a contractor seeking recovery must prove that its d
Limitation of Liability Provision Enforceable in Construction Context
Recently, our firm prevailed on appeal at the Fort Worth Court of Appeals, obtaining a holding that a limitation of liability provision in a home inspector’s contract was enforceable under Texas law.
This opinion arises from a lawsuit originally filed by Cornelius Joe Ergonis and Linda Ann Ergonis (“Ergonis”) in Denton County against William Thomas Sultzbaugh and Sharon Elliot Sultzbaugh (collectively “Sultzbaughs”), Ebby Halliday Real Estate, Inc. and Kathy Gibson (collectively “Ebby Halliday”), Lighthouse Engineering LLC (“Lighthouse”), and Paul Wood Inspection Group, Inc.,
Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of TxDOT Contractor Immunity Under Section 97.002
The Texas Supreme Court recently issued an important decision for contractors, subcontractors, and infrastructure companies involved in public roadway projects. In Third Coast Services, LLC v. Castaneda, the Court held that statutory protection under Section 97.002 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code does not depend on a direct contractual relationship with the Texas Department of Transportation (“TxDOT”).
The opinion provides guidance on three recurring issues in roadway-construction litigation: whether Section 97.002 requires contractual privity with TxDOT, what it means to per







