Dallas Austin

Last month, a Texas jury found that FedEx Corp. retaliated against a former employee and awarded the former employee $365 million in punitive damages, $120,000 for past pain and suffering, and $1.04 million for future mental anguish. The jury was apparently more disturbed about retaliation for reporting racial discrimination than the alleged discrimination, itself, finding no discrimination had occurred. Jennifer Harris, an African American woman, started working for FedEx in 2007 as an entry-level sales representative. For nearly a decade, she was a rising star at the company, receiving sever

Attorney’s fees are a considerable expense in litigating construction disputes, whether you are plaintiff or defendant.  But, against whom are they recoverable and are they covered by insurance?  Recent changes to Chapter 38 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code (the “TCPRC”) significantly change the answer to this question. Recovering Attorney’s Fees Beyond Individuals or Corporations Unlike many other states, Texas creates a statutory right to recover attorney’s fees under certain circumstances.  Under that statute, Chapter 82 TCPRC, a party can recover attorney’s fee

What happens to nuclear verdicts on appeal? The El Paso Court of Appeals recently issued a sobering opinion, overruling a $7 million verdict. In Claxton v. Rayner, Claxton’s windshield was hit by a portion of the load that Rayner was transporting on behalf of his employer, Even Better Logistics (EBL).   While Rayner was transporting an oversized load from Dayton to Abilene, he took the wrong exit and ended up on a route that was not part of his TxDOT required route.  The TxDOT route was selected because he was transporting an oversized load. Rayner allegedly did not realize he was on the

When does an “as-is” sale support of claim of deceptive trade practices? A recent case from the Austin Court of Appeals provides some insight as well as a cautionary tale to anyone selling a property requiring repair. In Christians v. Flores, Flores sued Christians regarding the “as-is” purchase of a home located in Austin, Texas, asserting that Christians failed to disclose issues with the home’s roof.  Prior to the sale of the property, the roof was damaged by a hailstorm. A roofer who visited the house testified at trial that a storm had damaged the roof beyond repair and needed

Do engineers owe fiduciary duties to the general public based on rules issued by their governing board? The Houston Court of Appeals recently examined this issue and held that, absent a relationship of trust and confidence, the board rules do not create such a duty. At issue in Hussion Street Buildings, LLC v. TRW Engineers, Inc., was a housing development constructed adjacent to property owned by Hussion. TRW was a civil engineer involved in the development. Hussion alleged that TRW’s scope of work included design of a water-detention plan, but that TRW failed to design or specify one. Huss

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the massive social and economic consequences it has wrought, owners and contractors alike have taken a harder look at their contracts.  Do the contracts have force majeure, waiver of consequential damages, or no damages for delay clauses?  Are the clauses written broadly enough to encompass the pandemic and its aftershocks?  It is safe to say that contracts negotiated pre-2020 look a lot different from those prepared after the pandemic was declared. One provision not regularly included in pre-pandemic construction contracts, but now standard in n

What makes a worker an employee versus an independent contractor?  How you classify an individual may change, depending on whether proposed revisions to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by the Department of Labor are accepted and enacted. The proposed revisions were posted on the Federal Register’s website on October 13, 2022 and will be available for public comment until November 28, 2022. The proposal seeks to broaden the factors used to determine whether a worker is an employee, allowing more workers to be classified as employees who would then be entitled to the minimum wage and over