Round Two: New Face Covering Orders Relating To COVID-19
Our fight against the novel coronavirus in Texas is not going well.
The State quickly reopened for business after a lengthy shelter-at-home period. Newly reported cases and hospitalizations in Texas for the month of June have reached unprecedented levels. Under pressure from the mayors and county judges from the State’s largest population centers, Governor Abbott recently clarified that local authorities have the power to mandate that businesses require employees and visitors to wear face coverings.
Reminiscent of the patchwork of shelter-at-home orders that Texas cities and coun
Release Me! Releases Of Liability In The COVID-19 Era
And there it is, just like that. Attended the rally for President Trump in Tulsa? Then, you were required to agree to the following COVID-19 release.
By clicking register below, you are acknowledging that an inherent risk of exposure to COVID-19 exists in any public place where people are present. By attending the Rally, you and any guests voluntarily assume all risks related to exposure to COVID-19 and agree not to hold Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.; BOK Center; ASM Global; or any of their affiliates, directors, officers, employees, agents, contractors, or volunteers liable for
Don’t You (Forget About Me): Architect and Engineer Lien Rights in Texas
Lien rights of architects and engineers are not widely publicized and are often forgotten or purposefully not asserted. Some designers do not know they have such rights and others are concerned that asserting them may lead an owner or developer to assert claims for design errors and omissions. Since the bulk of a designer’s work is typically completed before construction begins, a construction contractor may not even know that the designer has asserted lien rights. Such knowledge might provide an early clue about the owner’s or developer’s payment habits and telegraph to the contract
Getting What You Pay For: Betterment
What is a design professional’s legal responsibility for an enhancement to her original design? What if the enhancement is necessitated by a design error and omission? Welcome to world of betterment, not necessarily a better world, but almost certainly a bettered one.
What is betterment?
If you are looking for a Texas court or statute to define “betterment”, you will have a long and frustrating search. While there are cases that reference jury instructions about betterment and there are Texas statutes that discuss “improvements”, there is no definitive case-law or statutory d
Case Note: A Bridge Too Far? Clarified Standards For Liquidated Damages
The Texas Supreme Court recently clarified the standards for enforcing liquidated damage provisions. As these types of provisions are prevalent in design and construction contracts, the Court’s opinion has particular resonance in the construction industry.
In Atrium Medical Center, LP v. Houston Red C, LLC, the Court held that liquidated damage provisions, to be enforceable, must be “facially reasonable” and must not create an “unbridgeable discrepancy” between actual and liquidated damages. The Court also clarified which party bears the burden of proving facial reasonableness an
Should v. Must: Labor Union Sues OSHA Over COVID-19 Standards
As children, we quickly learn the difference between “should” and “must”, particularly when it comes to homework, chores, and eating nutritious foods. On May 18, the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), the largest federation of unions in the United States, initiated legal proceedings seeking to compel the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to issue mandatory workplace standards, a must, rather than the current guidelines, a should.
Since the beginning of the outbreak, the AFL-CIO and a number of other labor unions hav
Minding Your P’s: Proposed Amendments to the Payroll Protection Program (PPP)
In recent days, the United States Congress has taken up modifying the Payroll Protection Program (PPP). Last week, the House of Representatives passed a bill that made significant changes to the Program. The Senate has yet to pass the House bill or its own bill to modify the PPP.
The House bill broadens the length of time for an employer to use its PPP loan as well as how the employer may allocate the loan funds. In particular, the bill modifies the following provisions of the PPP.
Increases the time limit in which the loan funds can be used from 8 weeks to 24 weeks so that businesses can







